Monday, September 21 2026

China Post's Foray into the Coffee Track Hits a Snag: An In-Depth Analysis of the Rejection of the "Post Office Coffee" Trademark Application

China Post has made a high-profile entry into the coffee market, yet it has encountered setbacks in the trademark registration process. In April of this year, several "Post Coffee POST COFFEE" trademarks submitted by the postal group all received rejection notices. This incident has sparked widespread attention: is it because common terms lack distinctiveness, or because they are similar to existing trademarks? Will the trademark obstacle affect the daily operations of Post Coffee? At the same time, disputes over "who is the first Post Coffee" continue to ferment in Xiamen, Zhongshan, and other places. This article will sort out the sequence of events, analyze the legal logic behind the trademark rejection, and bring a professional perspective from Front Street Coffee. [more…]

HEYTEA Coffee's trademark registration was rejected due to deceptiveness and similarity, and its lawsuit against the China National Intellectual Property Administration also failed.

In 2019, Heytea made a cross-industry foray into coffee products, blending milk tea elements into coffee and applying to register the "Heytea Coffee" trademark. However, the China National Intellectual Property Administration deemed the trademark deceptive and similar to the cited trademark "Xicha," rejecting the registration application. Heytea's affiliated company disagreed and sued the China National Intellectual Property Administration. The court of first instance upheld the rejection decision, finding that the disputed trademark could easily mislead the public about the characteristics and quality of the goods and cause confusion with another party's prior trademark. This article reviews the case process and the court's key rulings, for coffee enthusiasts to learn about brand trademark protection developments. [more…]

China Post's Coffee Trademark Application Rejected: An Analysis of China Post's Cross-Industry Layout and the Industry Boom

China Post's application for the "邮局咖啡 POST COFFEE" trademark was recently rejected, sparking widespread attention. Since the first store opened in Xiamen in February 2022, Post Coffee has expanded to four cities—Xiamen, Nanjing, Quanzhou, and Beijing—with six stores, focusing on a blend of postal nostalgia and cultural creativity. The co-founder had planned to open a hundred stores by the end of the year, but the trademark registration setback has led to widespread discussion online. Meanwhile, giants from various industries such as Li-Ning, Xtep, Tongrentang, and East Buy have entered the coffee sector. What are the prospects for cross-industry coffee ventures? This article reviews Post Coffee's expansion journey, product features, and trademark controversy, and takes stock of cross-industry dynamics in the industry. [more…]

The Full Story of the "Chayan Yuese" Trademark Being Declared Invalid: Deemed Similar to Chayan Yuese and Rejected, Registrant Sues CNIPA and Loses

The trademark dispute in the tea beverage industry is once again making waves. Previously, Coffee Workshop reported that "Cha Yan Guan Se" lost its trademark infringement lawsuit against "Cha Yan Yue Se," and "Cha Yan Yue Se" won its counterclaim against "Cha Yan Guan Se." Now another one has emerged: "Cha Yan Yue Se." This trademark, applied for registration in 2018, was declared invalid by the National Intellectual Property Administration because it was highly similar to the genuine Cha Yan Yue Se in terms of text composition, pronunciation, and graphic design. The registrant, a certain Guo, refused to accept the ruling and actually sued the CNIPA in court, but was ultimately rejected by the Beijing Intellectual Property Court. From "Cha Yan Guan Se" to "Cha Yan Yue Se," imitators keep emerging one after another. This farce once again reminds us: trademark protection is by no means child's play. Although the road to brand rights protection is long, the law will ultimately provide a fair answer. [more…]

"People's Cafe" has nearly 30 locations nationwide, yet its trademark has been repeatedly rejected: the compliance of its store logo sparks heated debate

Recently, a coffee shop branded "People's Coffee" sparked widespread discussion in Shijiazhuang. A subsequent media investigation found that similar stores have covered 18 provinces and 20 cities nationwide, with nearly 30 directly operated outlets. Its parent company, YaoChao (Shanghai) Culture Communication Co., Ltd., has applied for the "People's Coffee" trademark multiple times since 2022, but all applications were rejected. It only holds two registered trademarks: "Chao People's Coffee" and "YaoChao People's Coffee." However, the actual store signs do not display the words "Chao" or "YaoChao." This phenomenon has drawn public attention to commercial signage compliance, trademark usage norms, and potential legal risks, and lawyers have also offered professional interpretations. [more…]

Oatly's application to trademark "Barista" in New Zealand was rejected, drawing renewed attention to the controversy over registering generic terms.

Recently, Oatly, a giant in the oat milk industry, attempted to register the word "Barista" as a trademark in New Zealand, but encountered strong opposition from local food wholesaler Bidfood. Bidfood argued that the term has long been a generic name in the plant-based milk sector and should not be monopolized by any company. The New Zealand Intellectual Property Office ultimately supported Bidfood's position, determining that "Barista" is a descriptive term when used for dairy alternatives. This incident not only highlights the challenges of determining generic names in international trademark registration but also brings to mind similar cases in China, such as the trademark squatting of "Geisha Coffee." Where exactly is the boundary of trademark protection? What potential risks does the registration of generic names pose to the industry? This article will provide a detailed analysis for you. [more…]

Hong Kong Manner stores were forced to change their name to Maners, but netizens mistook it for a knockoff brand

Recently, a Hong Kong netizen spotted a coffee shop called "Maners" in a large local supermarket. Its logo, decor, and product posters closely resemble those of mainland Manner, and it even offers a 5-yuan discount for bringing your own cup, sparking suspicions of a knockoff. However, the truth is surprising—this store is actually Manner's legitimate outlet in Hong Kong. Because the "Manner" trademark has already been registered by another Hong Kong company, Manner was forced to adjust its name and launch as "Maners." The trademark application was rejected and failed on review. Although it can currently continue to be used, it is not legally protected and carries future infringement risks. This renaming saga not only led fans to mistakenly attack the real brand but also sounded a warning about trademark layout when brands go overseas. [more…]

Mixue Approx. Affiliate Sentenced to Pay 510,000 Yuan for Trademark Infringement of Mixue Bingcheng; Defensive Trademark Portfolio Becomes a Moat for Tea Beverage Brands

The new tea beverage sector continues to heat up, and the phenomenon of brand trademarks being maliciously infringed upon is becoming increasingly frequent. Well-known brands such as Heytea, The Alley, and Sexy Tea have all encountered counterfeit troubles, and this time it is Mixue Bingcheng, with stores all over the world, that is affected. A milk tea brand called Mixueyue was sued by Mixue Bingcheng for trademark infringement because its text and trademark were highly similar to the Mixue Bingcheng series of trademarks. The final judgment ordered Mixueyue to pay 512,184 yuan in compensation, and its appeal request was rejected. Mixue Bingcheng has more than 22,000 stores worldwide, and its A-share listing application has also been accepted, while Mixueyue Company has now been deregistered. Behind this lawsuit is the strategy of leading tea beverage brands building a legal moat through defensive trademarks. This article takes you through the whole case, the backgrounds of both parties, and the operating logic of defensive trademarks. [more…]

Baghdad's Counterfeit Starbucks Defies Lawsuit and Keeps Operating, Trademark Infringement Dispute Draws Attention

In Baghdad, the capital of Iraq, a café that uses authentic Starbucks cups, napkins, and coffee remains open as usual despite facing legal action. This unauthorized store bears the Starbucks mermaid logo on everything from its signage to in-store details, enough to pass as the real thing. The owner, Amin Makhsusi, tried to apply for official permission but was rejected, and ultimately decided to open on his own, claiming connections to local powerful figures. Starbucks is trying to stop this infringement through a lawsuit, but the case was suspended due to alleged threats. This incident reflects Iraq's severe trademark piracy problem, where offenders often act with impunity because they are protected by powerful groups. [more…]

Blue Bottle Coffee Loses Trademark Case: Court Finds No Likelihood of Confusion with Blue Brew

Blue Bottle Coffee, deeply ingrained in people's minds with its minimalist small blue bottle image, has always been regarded as the Apple of the coffee world, and its blue-and-white colored utensils are also highly sought after by fans. However, the brand has not had a smooth journey in trademark enforcement. This week, Blue Bottle Coffee lost a trademark lawsuit in the United States, as a judge in the Federal District Court for the Northern District of California denied its motion for judgment against the coffee utensil brand Blue Brew, finding that the two trademarks are clearly different and that consumers would not be confused. What impact will this ruling have on Blue Bottle Coffee's trademark protection strategy? Let's take a closer look. [more…]

Tea Yanyuese Wins Trademark Infringement Lawsuit with 1.7 Million Yuan in Damages, Brand Logo and Trademark Dispute Finally Settled

The trademark and unfair competition dispute between Chayan Yuese and Chayan Guanse has finally reached a阶段性 result. The Tianxin District People's Court of Changsha ruled in the first instance that Chayan Guanse lost the case and must stop the relevant infringing publicity and compensate Chayan Yuese 1.7 million yuan in total for economic losses and reasonable legal costs. This years-long tug-of-war over rights protection, from Chayan Guanse taking the initiative to sue Chayan Yuese, to Chayan Yuese resolutely filing a counterclaim and ultimately winning, has been full of twists and turns. Founded in 2013, Chayan Yuese is a well-known local milk tea brand in Changsha, featuring a Chinese style and adhering to a direct-operation model for a long time. It was only in 2020 that it expanded beyond Changsha to Wuhan, Shenzhen, and other places. After winning the case, the brand announced that it would issue discount coupons to members in celebration. This article sorts out the ins and outs of the case, the brand's development history, and the background related to its Logo design, providing a comprehensive interpretation for coffee and tea beverage enthusiasts. [more…]

SexyTea, the English logo of Chayan Yuese, Sparks Controversy Again: An Expression of Charm or a Marketing Misstep?

Recently, Nanjing's third Chayan Yuese store sparked widespread discussion online for using "SexyTea" as its English signage. Some people believe the term clashes with the brand's classical and gentle tone, and may even be disrespectful to women; others feel that "Sexy" inherently means charming and attractive, and there's no need to overinterpret it. In fact, this is not the first time Chayan Yuese has fallen into controversy over its copy or signage. Previously, the "picking up scraps" cup copy prompted an apology for objectifying women. This article sorts out the sequence of events, various viewpoints, and regulatory responses, and includes professional coffee information channels for coffee enthusiasts and brand observers to reference. [more…]

The Origins and Unique Charm of Pour-Over Coffee: From the Melitta Filter to the Flavor Pursuit of the Third Wave

As the core of the third wave of coffee, pour-over coffee emphasizes savoring the original flavors of coffee, rejecting any additives, and preserving the most pristine aroma and taste. This wave is still evolving today. If you are also a pour-over enthusiast, you might want to learn about its history: from Melitta Bentz's invention of the filter brewing method in 1873 using blotting paper and a brass pot, to the patent registration in 1908, and then to the development of the Melitta company and the birth of the American coffee machine. This article will take you through the origins and characteristics of pour-over coffee, and how it has won over countless coffee fans. [more…]

Geisha Coffee Generic Name Registered as a Trademark? Red Label and Champion Geisha Spark Industry Concern

In recent years, Geisha coffee has continued to rise in popularity within China's specialty coffee circles, but recently a company successfully registered trademarks such as "Red Label Geisha" and "Champion Geisha," and attempted to also claim "Geisha Coffee," sparking industry concerns about the privatization of a generic name. This article traces Geisha's journey from Ethiopian forests to the Panama Hacienda La Esmeralda, explains the origins of the red, green, and blue label grading systems, as well as the meaning of "Champion Geisha" in BOP auctions, and explores the risks that registering generic names as trademarks may pose to coffee professionals — a topic worthy of attention for every coffee lover and practitioner. [more…]

Dark Roast Single-Origin Bean Recommendation | How Are the Origin Quality and Flavor of Indonesian PWN Golden Mandheling? How Should Golden Mandheling Coffee Beans Be Brewed to Taste Good Without Bitterness?

In the early days of specialty coffee, Blue Mountain, Kona, and Golden Mandheling were practically must-have options on every coffee shop's menu. Unlike today's pursuit of coffee with rich floral and fruity acidity, the specialty coffee of the past sought a mellow, solid mouthfeel. Many people reject dark-roasted coffee, perhaps because [more…]

Luckin Coffee's hiring policy sparks heated debate: the costs and prejudice behind rejecting job applicants with Shanghai residency

Recently, Luckin Coffee has sparked widespread controversy due to a shortage of staff in its stores caused by reforms to its employment system, while simultaneously rejecting local job applicants in Shanghai during recruitment. A Shanghai netizen applied for a part-time barista position but was directly turned down because their ID number began with '310', with the reason given being 'currently Luckin in Shanghai does not accept locals'. This incident reflects companies' stereotypes about local job seekers—such as being 'unable to endure hardship' and 'demanding social insurance'—and also touches on practical considerations like high social insurance contribution bases and labor cost control. Against the backdrop of a simultaneous labor shortage and employment difficulties, is Luckin's recruitment strategy reasonable? And how should the rights and interests of local job seekers be safeguarded? This article will delve into the multiple factors behind this phenomenon. [more…]

How Hard Is It for Former Employees to Return to Luckin? Repeated Rejections of Rehire Applications Spark Heated Discussion

In the coffee industry, it is not uncommon for employees to leave and later return to their original company. However, a former Luckin Coffee employee who tried to return to the bar in a part-time capacity after a two-year absence ran into repeated rejections. The recruiter explicitly stated that "those who have previously worked at Luckin cannot be rehired," a rule that has sparked confusion and discussion among many former employees. Compared with Starbucks' open attitude toward rehiring former employees, why is Luckin's recruitment policy so strict? Is it out of consideration for stability, or is there another reason? This article will walk you through the various perspectives behind this phenomenon. [more…]

HEYTEA's "Buddha Joy Tea" collaboration was summoned for talks and taken down, as the commercialization of religious elements sparked both legal and public opinion scrutiny.

The "Buddha Joy Tea" series, a collaboration between Heytea and the Jingdezhen China Ceramics Museum, was urgently pulled from shelves just days after launch because it used religious figures such as bodhisattvas and arhats in commercial packaging. The Shenzhen Municipal Ethnic and Religious Affairs Bureau determined that it was testing the boundaries, and after being summoned for talks, Heytea quickly made corrections. This incident not only abruptly ended the viral popularity of the "Speechless Bodhisattva" cup, but also once again brought the legal red line on the commercialization of religious elements into public view. For the coffee and tea beverage industry, how co-branded marketing can strike a balance between creativity and compliance has become an issue that urgently needs consideration. Front Street Coffee always pays attention to industry trends and reminds brands that while chasing hot topics, they must not ignore the sensitive boundaries of law and culture. [more…]

Luckin Coffee interviews frequently trend on social media: job seekers labeled negatively, recruitment standards spark controversy

Recently, Luckin Coffee has hit the trending topics twice in a row over interview-related incidents, sparking widespread discussion. One job applicant said that after failing an interview, she was labeled "timid and weak," which was completely at odds with her performance that day; another 26-year-old woman was rejected for being too old. The poster also revealed that Luckin staff had called her demanding she delete the post, and after she refused, they turned to contacting her family. These incidents have drawn public attention to this chain coffee company, whose store count has now surpassed 20,000, and the issue of inconsistent hiring standards under its two models—directly operated and joint-venture—has gradually come to light. [more…]

Brazil's coffee harvest accelerates but sales lag; market expected to recover after Congress rejects new tax rules

Brazil's new coffee crop harvest is progressing faster than in previous years, and the dry weather is both beneficial for processing and a cause for concern. However, sales progress is noticeably lagging, ports remain congested, and the government's earlier proposed changes to PIS/Cofins tax rules have further weighed on exports and farmers' willingness to sell. At the same time, the sharp appreciation of the US dollar against the real has brought inflationary pressure. The good news is that Brazil's Congress recently rejected the tax measure, allowing coffee and other agricultural products to continue enjoying tax benefits, and the slowdown in sales is expected to improve. This article will review the latest developments in harvesting, sales, ports, and policy, and include relevant recommendations from Front Street Coffee. [more…]